Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Cadeau

PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY OF GREAT BRITAIN V BOOTS CASH CHEMISTS (SOUTHERN) LD. [1951 P. zero(prenominal) 1413.] [COURT OF APPEAL] [1953] 1 QB 401 HEARING-DATES: 5 February 1953 5 February 1953 CATCHWORDS: Poisons - bargains agreement of - self-service body - cream of articles by customer from shelves - Payment at funds desk in presence of qualified pharmacist - Legality - apothecarys shop and Poisons Act, 1933 (23 & 24 Geo. 5, c. 25), s. 18 (1) (a) (iii). Contract - Offer and acceptance - Sale of goods - Self-service - Time of sale. HEADNOTE: The defendants branch shop, consisting of a single room, was change to the self-service schema. The room contained chemists department, under the realise of a registered pharmacist, in which various doses and proprietary medicines included, or containing substances included, in pop bug out I of the Poisons List compiled under subsection 17 (1) of the pharmaceutics and Poisons Act, 1933, (but not in Sch. I to the Poisons Rules, 1949 ), were displayed on shelves in packages or other(a) containers, with the toll marked on each.
bestessaycheap.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
A customer, on entryway the shop, was provided with a wire basket, and having selected from the shelves the articles which he wished to buy, he ascribe them in the basket and took them to the cashiers desk at one or other of the twain exits, whore the cashier stated the total price and get payment. That latter stage of every transaction involving the sale of a drug was supervised by the pharmacist in control of the department, who was authorized to prevent the removal of any drug from the premises. In an action brought by the plaintiffs alleg ing an infringement by the defendants of sec! tion 18 (1) (a) (iii) of the Pharmacy and Poisons Act, 1933, which requires the sale of poisons included in graphic sign I of the Poisons List to be effected by or under the supervision of a registered pharmacist:Held, that the self-service outline did not amount to an offer by the defendants to sell, but just to an invitation to the customer to offer to buy; that such an...If you want to eliminate a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.